How is it legal to encrypt satellite television?

TOPICS:

You might have heard it said that the electromagnetic spectrum, the thing that encompasses all radio and TV broadcasting, is a public trust. It belongs to everyone, like the national parks, and it’s intended to be used to benefit the public. That’s why you can put up an antenna and get free TV, and why your car can pick up free radio stations. So if that’s true, how can it be that satellite TV is encrypted?

Does it make any sense?

Let’s back up a minute. You can’t put up any old satellite dish and watch DIRECTV or DISH on your TV without paying for it. It’s not a limitation of the technology; several countries have what they call “Freeview” service where you can actually do that; get an 18″ dish and buy a satellite receiver and get free satellite TV forever. There was a time you could do that in the US, although you needed a bigger dish. So it’s not like they haven’t figured out how to do it. The problem is that it doesn’t make sense, at least not in the US.

The countries that have Freeview satellites are the ones where TV stations are operated and paid for by the government. There are usually only a few channels that you can get for free; either you have to pay for additional ones or you need a different system. For example in Great Britain you can put up a Freeview dish but if you want more than a handful of channels, you need to get SKY service, the British equivalent to DIRECTV.

US law is a little different

The important part of this whole thing is the notion of “serving the public,” which is expected to be done by for-profit broadcasters. With TV and radio stations, for-profit broadcasters are required to put on a certain amount of public affairs programming every week, but that hasn’t been a very useful thing over the years.

Starting in the 1990s, the FCC began to think of “serving the public” in a completely different way. They could have looked at broadcasting as something that had to be free to everyone. Instead they decided that local TV did a very good job serving the public. In other words, freee antenna TV met the baseline level of service. The public could be better served by having hundreds of channels, but that costs a lot of money, and no pay-TV channel is going to let you put up their signal when anyone could just steal it and redistribute it. In short, in the 60s, 70s, and 80s the government wanted to protect you from corporations, and in the 90s and beyond they realized that sometimes corporations had the right answers.

Opting in for more content

One answer that’s been very successful is satellite television. It’s a closed system, but you don’t have to use it if you don’t want to. If you do want to, you can choose your programming level and the companies will provide you with hardware to decode the programs you’re paying for. They do it with sophisticated encryption technology. For the moment at least, hacking that technology takes so much time that no one’s done it on a large scale. The government lets satellite providers add encryption and charge for decryption because if they didn’t, those companies wouldn’t be in business for very long.

So it’s legal to encrypt satellite TV because otherwise there wouldn’t be satellite TV. At least, not satellite TV as we know it in the US. It seems to me that satellite TV “serves the public” better than not having satellite TV. End of story.

Make sense? If it does, and you’re ready to upgrade to satellite TV, call us at 888-233-7563 during East Coast business hours. If it’s after hours, fill out the form below and we’ll get back to you, usually within one business day.

About the Author

Stuart Sweet
Stuart Sweet is the editor-in-chief of The Solid Signal Blog and a "master plumber" at Signal Group, LLC. He is the author of over 10,000 articles and longform tutorials including many posted here. Reach him by clicking on "Contact the Editor" at the bottom of this page.