Do I need an antenna that pulls in VHF-Low?

TOPICS:

There are some of you… not many, but some… who will need to put a large antenna up on the roof in order to get local channels. How large? Think of the antennas you saw on roofs growing up. That large. Even though most people can make do with something  much smaller, there are some areas where a big antenna is a must.

Why does this still happen?

Yes, the digital TV transition was supposed to fix all this. TV broadcasting should have left the so-called “VHF-Low” band that includes channels 2,3,4,5, and 6. In fact at one point the hope was that all channels would go to UHF, meaning smaller and more efficient antennas for everyone. There are still a lot of VHF stations out there, but at least most have moved to the “VHF-High” band of channels 7-13 where a smaller antenna can be used.

So what’s the problem?

The lower channels need a larger antenna because as you get into those lower frequencies, the waves themselves get longer, and a longer wave needs a longer antenna. In fact that’s sort of the key part of antenna design — there’s a very precise relationship between the broadcast frequency and the length of antenna that receives it best. As wavelengths get shorter, it gets easier and easier to have one antenna that does a good job for more frequencies, which is why UHF antennas can be very compact.

A little research led to a list (accurate as far as I know) of markets with VHF-Low channels. Here’s what it boils down to:

  • There are 56 markets with one VHF-Low station. Although this is roughly double the number that there were five years ago, there aren’t any markets with more than one network affiliate on VHF-Low.
  • There’s a pretty big spread in the kinds of cities with VHF-Low channels. Los Angeles has one, so do Chicago, Boston and Philadelphia. And on the other side, you’ll find Altoona PA, Miles City MT, and Manchester VT on that list.
  • The biggest market with a “must-have” VHF-Low antenna is Philadelphia. WPVI Channel 6 has been broadcasting on the same frequency since it signed on and stubbornly refuses to change.

Of course this doesn’t mean that some of these channels aren’t important. Only you can decide this. Some are public broadcasting channels, others are non-English. If these are important to you, then you’ll need that big antenna if you’re more than a few miles from the center of the city.

What can you do?

If you are in one of these VHF-Low markets, you have a bit of a challenge ahead of you if you want to cut the cord. If you’re in the city center, you’ll probably be able to pick up the channel you want no matter what antenna you use. Out in the suburbs you’ll have to rely on one of those old-school Yagi antennas like you see at the top of this article. It doesn’t have to be the massive 8200XL, but you will need something that’s optimized for VHF-Low frequencies.

In the past, I would have recommended you put up a separate VHF-Low antenna. In recent years those have become pretty hard to find. Really your best option is going to be the bigger antenna. Smaller antennas with a lot of amplification “might” pick up those channels but it’s not a sure bet. Unfortunately this is one of those times. What I mean is… “size matters” and there’s “no substitute for cubic inches.” Those sayings might not hold up in other areas, but when it comes to VHF-Low antennas, they sure do.

If you’re not sure about which antenna to purchase, ask your friends at Solid Signal! We have a free service which will choose the right antenna or antennas for your area!

About the Author

Stuart Sweet
Stuart Sweet is the editor-in-chief of The Solid Signal Blog and a "master plumber" at Signal Group, LLC. He is the author of over 10,000 articles and longform tutorials including many posted here. Reach him by clicking on "Contact the Editor" at the bottom of this page.

10 Comments on "Do I need an antenna that pulls in VHF-Low?"

  1. Channels 2.1 through 2.9, all on VHF-Low. METV, Decades, Retro TV, to name a few. Atmosphere and weather determines whether I get a decent signal or barely a signal at all, on a day to day basis.

  2. Living in the Philly suburbs trying to get WPVI (channel 6) as well as MeTV is such a pain in the butt. I installed an “Ultimate Antenna” from eBay in the attic but it’s still choppy.

    • That channel is a tough one, yes. You probably need an antenna specifically tailored for those low frequencies.

      • I don’t get it at all. I just purchased and assembled an antenna that I was told would work from Solid Signal and I feel like I was taken. I don’t get MeTV at all either. I am on the New Jersey side of Philadelphia, 45 miles Southeast with an amplifier and nobody can do anything to help me.

        • Hi, I’m so sorry you’re having problems. I sent your comment to our general manager and hopefully they will contact you very shortly.

          • Dawnne Howarth | February 10, 2022 at 9:45 pm |

            Thank you so much. I don’t know what to do. My 82-year-old father has turned the antenna every which way possible. I called technical support but they offered no solutions and told me there was nothing they could do, but I was told in chat with someone at Sound Signal that this was the antenna I needed and it would work. I do not get 2 or 6. I know also that when I was put on hold and the support person came back and said it wasn’t guaranteed to work-RCA said it should and that I should not have been told this. To tell a family living on a fixed income that they bought something, assembled it, put it up, but it won’t work and there is no way to fix/come up with an solution is pretty bad.

  3. WPVI could NOT move as the UHF and VHF High channels were used in NY and Baltimore..with WPVI in the middle ABC looked at several options, none looked best…and they decided to stay on RF 6.. ATSC V3 will correct the issue…but the FCC gave them such low ERP, ATSC V1 just sux right now

  4. WQED Pittsburgh is on VHF channel 4. Im only 10 miles from the transmitter, and struggling. Has anyone fooled with a compact hilbert design for 69mhz?

Leave a comment